CO129-490 - Public Offices - 1925 — Page 474

var mid os Msomi ci înd vs it we leto 2) proveo TOPTA

5.

Dests were not re-employed and that the reinstate-

ment of the private employens was agreed to without

468

14

afɔmmđộ vino «di vita«Is am shaolvant? boa YTORADİ İD

@iszexe Tar „kepada te vam mið al

*

* „500£1Mzon znied arow orlier sdi Jais sem*

Y

ST33 MB LA 39) Baad YLIMU Iza bei JONGEZOATIA adă

„9910? ##[{q* *715 80 MAL

*moblasti" Qix galimž co bastus? hai

*** ku sonpesto adi quo:LJEN

any positive undertaking as to payment of their

strike-time wages, it being in most cases talf-wages

#ich were actually paid. The strikers on their elde

were able to boast that the obnoxious Police Permit

Regulations had been rescinded and it mattered little

that the amended form in which the old system was

to be maintained mode its practical effect in all

important respects identical with that of the ras-

cinded legislation. The chief differences made were

(a) the application to foreigners as well as to

hinese of the permit system, and (b) the requiring

of only one copy instead of three of the photograph,

both of which are comparatively trivial concessions

such as could almost certainly have been secured in

any case by amicable representations at the proper

„brə na už štvord viisa 12

time.

bab-lango xHacioove Items[Jžna við HI

wa niløset of

*I* ST be fem sollen s

The remumption of work by the strikers was

by no means immediately followed by the subsidence

/of the